From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43199)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <catalin.vasile@freescale.com>) id 1YT3rP-0007oP-75
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 02:36:51 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <catalin.vasile@freescale.com>) id 1YT3rK-0000gW-8X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 02:36:51 -0500
Received: from mail-by2on0148.outbound.protection.outlook.com
	([207.46.100.148]:47754
	helo=na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <catalin.vasile@freescale.com>) id 1YT3rK-0000gS-0h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 02:36:46 -0500
Message-ID: <54F6B601.60701@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 09:36:33 +0200
From: Vasile Catalin-B50542 <catalin.vasile@freescale.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [vhost] vq_index from struct vhost_dev
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Why does the field vq_index exist in each struct vhost_dev?
Why isn't each vhost_dev using a vqs pointer starting directly from 
their first usable vq?