qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] dma-helpers: Move reschedule_dma BH to blk's AioContext
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:33:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5502D92A.5070907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5502C074.2060807@redhat.com>



On 13/03/2015 11:48, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > The other possibility is grab a reference for the cpu_register_map_client call,
> > and release it in reschedule_dma. This way the atomics can keep, but we'll need
> > a "finished" flag in DMAAIOCB to avoid double completion.
> Considering this is a slow path, a lock seems preferrable.

And another problem...

You need to be careful about dma_aio_cancel running together with the
continue_after_map_failure, because continue_after_map_failure can be
called by another thread.  You could have

     continue_after_map_failure               dma_aio_cancel
     ------------------------------------------------------------------
     aio_bh_new
                                              qemu_bh_delete
     qemu_bh_schedule (use after free)

To fix this, my suggestion is to pass a BH directly to
cpu_register_map_client (possibly to cpu_unregister_map_client as well?
 seems to have pros and cons).  Then cpu_notify_clients can run entirely
with the lock taken, and not race against cpu_unregister_map_client.
dma_aio_cancel can just do cpu_unregister_map_client followed by
qemu_bh_delete.

Paolo

      reply	other threads:[~2015-03-13 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-13  1:38 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] exec: Make bounce buffer thread safe Fam Zheng
2015-03-13  1:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] exec: Atomic access to bounce buffer Fam Zheng
2015-03-13  8:09   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-13  8:16     ` Fam Zheng
2015-03-13  8:32       ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-13  8:38         ` Fam Zheng
2015-03-13  8:41         ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-13  1:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] exec: Atomic access to map_client_list Fam Zheng
2015-03-13  8:11   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-13  1:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] exec: Notify cpu_register_map_client caller if the bounce buffer is available Fam Zheng
2015-03-13  8:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-13  1:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] dma-helpers: Move reschedule_dma BH to blk's AioContext Fam Zheng
2015-03-13  8:13   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-13  8:58     ` Fam Zheng
2015-03-13 10:48       ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-13 12:33         ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5502D92A.5070907@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).