From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, donald.d.dugger@intel.com,
jun.nakajima@intel.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX CPU models
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:25:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5503399F.5040307@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426273797-11204-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Am 13.03.2015 um 20:09 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> With the Intel microcode update that removed HLE and RTM, there will be
> different kinds of Haswell and Broadwell CPUs out there: some that still
> have the HLE and RTM features, and some that don't have the HLE and RTM
> features. On both cases people may be willing to use the pc-*-2.3
> machine-types.
>
> So instead of making the CPU model results confusing by making it depend on the
> machine-type, keep HLE and RTM on the existing Haswell and Broadwell CPU
> models, and introduce "Haswell-noTSX" and "Broadwell-noTSX" CPU models later,
> for people who have CPUs that don't have TSX feature available.
>
> Eduardo Habkost (2):
> Revert "target-i386: Disable HLE and RTM on Haswell & Broadwell"
> target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX
No objections from a generic CPU point of view.
Only thing that comes to mind is whether it might make sense to
hierarchically make Broadwell the parent type of Broadwell-noTSX, to
avoid duplication. But then again we already have a lot of it. ;)
Regards,
Andreas
> hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 4 ---
> hw/i386/pc_q35.c | 4 ---
> target-i386/cpu.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-13 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 19:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX CPU models Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-13 19:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "target-i386: Disable HLE and RTM on Haswell & Broadwell" Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-16 10:18 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-03-13 19:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-16 10:24 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-03-19 18:02 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-19 18:14 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-03-13 19:25 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2015-03-13 19:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX CPU models Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-14 11:42 ` Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5503399F.5040307@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=donald.d.dugger@intel.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).