From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
donald.d.dugger@intel.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX CPU models
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 12:42:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55041EBD.90601@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150313194518.GI3513@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
Am 13.03.2015 um 20:45 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 08:25:19PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Only thing that comes to mind is whether it might make sense to
>> hierarchically make Broadwell the parent type of Broadwell-noTSX, to
>> avoid duplication. But then again we already have a lot of it. ;)
>
> The builtin_x86_defs[] table has no way to represent inheritance,
> currently. Maybe one day when we move everything inside class_init
> functions. :)
If x86_cpu_compat_set_features(), x86_cpu_list() and
arch_query_cpu_definitions() get fixed to no longer operate on the old
builtin_x86_defs[] but on object_class_foreach() or similar functions,
then you can register special CPU types in x86_cpu_register_types(),
like we do for the KVM host type already.
In this case I imagined a custom class_init with an &= ~... operation.
But I wasn't aware we're still using the array in so many places! :/
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-14 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 19:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX CPU models Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-13 19:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "target-i386: Disable HLE and RTM on Haswell & Broadwell" Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-16 10:18 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-03-13 19:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-16 10:24 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-03-19 18:02 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-19 18:14 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-03-13 19:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX CPU models Andreas Färber
2015-03-13 19:45 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-14 11:42 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55041EBD.90601@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=donald.d.dugger@intel.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).