From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/4] exec: Protect map_client_list with mutex
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:33:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5506872D.9010409@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426483910-24597-3-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
On 16/03/2015 06:31, Fam Zheng wrote:
> So that accesses from multiple threads are safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> ---
> exec.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> index 4080044..3e54580 100644
> --- a/exec.c
> +++ b/exec.c
> @@ -429,15 +429,6 @@ address_space_translate_for_iotlb(CPUState *cpu, hwaddr addr,
> }
> #endif
>
> -void cpu_exec_init_all(void)
> -{
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> - qemu_mutex_init(&ram_list.mutex);
> - memory_map_init();
> - io_mem_init();
> -#endif
> -}
> -
> #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>
> static int cpu_common_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
> @@ -2494,6 +2485,7 @@ typedef struct MapClient {
> QLIST_ENTRY(MapClient) link;
> } MapClient;
>
> +QemuMutex map_client_list_lock;
> static QLIST_HEAD(map_client_list, MapClient) map_client_list
> = QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(map_client_list);
>
> @@ -2501,12 +2493,24 @@ void *cpu_register_map_client(void *opaque, void (*callback)(void *opaque))
> {
> MapClient *client = g_malloc(sizeof(*client));
>
> + qemu_mutex_lock(&map_client_list_lock);
> client->opaque = opaque;
> client->callback = callback;
> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&map_client_list, client, link);
> + qemu_mutex_unlock(&map_client_list_lock);
> return client;
> }
>
> +void cpu_exec_init_all(void)
> +{
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> + qemu_mutex_init(&ram_list.mutex);
> + memory_map_init();
> + io_mem_init();
> +#endif
> + qemu_mutex_init(&map_client_list_lock);
> +}
> +
You are moving cpu_exec_init_all within an #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY.
Does this patch compile for user-mode emulation?
The move itself is okay but only if you remove the two calls in
*-user/main.c (and possibly move the prototype to include/exec/exec-all.h).
> static void cpu_unregister_map_client(void *_client)
> {
> MapClient *client = (MapClient *)_client;
> @@ -2519,11 +2523,13 @@ static void cpu_notify_map_clients(void)
> {
> MapClient *client;
>
> + qemu_mutex_lock(&map_client_list_lock);
> while (!QLIST_EMPTY(&map_client_list)) {
> client = QLIST_FIRST(&map_client_list);
> client->callback(client->opaque);
A good rule of thumb is never hold a lock while calling "unknown" code.
This will be fixed in patch 4, so it's okay.
Paolo
> cpu_unregister_map_client(client);
> }
> + qemu_mutex_unlock(&map_client_list_lock);
> }
>
> bool address_space_access_valid(AddressSpace *as, hwaddr addr, int len, bool is_write)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-16 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-16 5:31 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] exec: Make bounce buffer thread safe Fam Zheng
2015-03-16 5:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/4] exec: Atomic access to bounce buffer Fam Zheng
2015-03-16 7:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-16 7:42 ` Fam Zheng
2015-03-16 5:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/4] exec: Protect map_client_list with mutex Fam Zheng
2015-03-16 7:33 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-03-16 7:55 ` Fam Zheng
2015-03-16 5:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] exec: Notify cpu_register_map_client caller if the bounce buffer is available Fam Zheng
2015-03-16 7:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-16 7:44 ` Fam Zheng
2015-03-16 5:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] dma-helpers: Fix race condition of continue_after_map_failure and dma_aio_cancel Fam Zheng
2015-03-16 7:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5506872D.9010409@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).