From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47089) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXWNP-00053J-DT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:52:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXWNO-0001HV-Jr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:52:19 -0400 Message-ID: <5506EE1B.2090501@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:52:11 -0400 From: Max Reitz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1424887718-10800-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <1424887718-10800-21-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <550027AB.4000107@redhat.com> <5506E173.1000808@redhat.com> <5506EC57.1090305@redhat.com> <5506ED66.9050607@redhat.com> <5506EDD5.9060708@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5506EDD5.9060708@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 20/25] block/nbd: Comment on discard/flush silently failing List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi On 2015-03-16 at 10:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 16/03/2015 15:49, Max Reitz wrote: >>> Right, but a better model than block.c should be for example >>> block/raw-posix.c, which returns ENOTSUP (I checked now...). >> Maybe we should catch ENOTSUP in bdrv_co_discard() and override it? > That's what it does: > > if (ret && ret != -ENOTSUP) { > return ret; > } Oops, thanks for telling me. Good, then I'll do that, thanks. Max > Returning 0 for NBD's flush_to_disk, by the way, is okay. > > Paolo