From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34903) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXXFz-00026O-VT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:48:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXXFv-0008Q4-SH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:48:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55000) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXXFv-0008P3-NC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:48:39 -0400 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F9DEC4089 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5506FB56.8050208@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:48:38 -0400 From: Max Reitz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1423501897-30410-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <1423501897-30410-4-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <20150304140014.GP3465@noname.str.redhat.com> <54F781D2.4060408@redhat.com> <20150305101145.GA5427@noname.redhat.com> <5506DC73.5050207@redhat.com> <87zj7drljl.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> In-Reply-To: <87zj7drljl.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 03/37] hw/block/fdc: Implement tray status List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Kevin Wolf , John Snow , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi On 2015-03-16 at 11:47, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Max Reitz writes: > > [...] >> So do you want to fix the floppy passthrough code? I don't even know >> how to fix it. I don't even know what's wrong with it, other than that >> something's ought to be wrong. > Having a driver to pass-through hardware next to nobody has anymore is > one thing. But maintaining special cases in the generic block layer for > it is another thing altogether: media handling is different, and the > difference is not fully encapsulated in the driver (at least last time I > checked). > > Can anybody tell me why spending developer time on floppy passthrough is > a justifiable investment? > > If not, let's drop it and move on. Do you want to do it? I don't want to be held responsible for it. ;-) Max