From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com,
stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] macio: split out unaligned DMA access into separate functions
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:23:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5507D680.5030507@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425939893-14404-1-git-send-email-mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
On 09.03.15 23:24, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> This patchset attempts to separate out the IDE/ATAPI logic from the unaligned
> DMA access logic for macio which provides the following benefits:
>
> 1) Reduced code complexity
>
> The existing macio IDE/ATAPI functions were becoming extremely difficult to
> follow through the various callbacks. By splitting up the functions in this
> way it becomes much easier to follow the DMA-specific sections of code.
>
> 2) Future-proofing
>
> If/when the block layer becomes able to handle unaligned DMA accesses directly
> then it should be possible to switch out pmac_dma_read() and pmac_dma_write()
> with their unaligned-capable bdrv_*() equivalents without having to change any
> other logic.
>
> 3) Fix intermittent CDROM detection under -M g3beige
>
> The code refactoring now correctly handles non-block ATAPI transfers which
> fixes the problem with intermittent CDROM detection with Darwin under
> -M g3beige.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
Works for me, I'd still prefer to just see unaligned bdrv_*() functions
and remove most of the logic we have here.
Either way, I think this is a reasonable intermediate step.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-17 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-09 22:24 [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] macio: split out unaligned DMA access into separate functions Mark Cave-Ayland
2015-03-09 22:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/2] macio: move unaligned DMA read code into separate pmac_dma_read() function Mark Cave-Ayland
2015-03-09 22:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/2] macio: move unaligned DMA write code into separate pmac_dma_write() function Mark Cave-Ayland
2015-03-17 7:23 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2015-04-28 20:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] macio: split out unaligned DMA access into separate functions Mark Cave-Ayland
2015-04-28 21:07 ` John Snow
2015-04-28 21:13 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2015-03-17 15:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-05-18 19:54 ` John Snow
2015-05-19 20:50 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2015-05-19 21:01 ` John Snow
2015-05-19 21:17 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2015-05-22 17:55 ` John Snow
2015-05-22 18:16 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2015-05-22 18:20 ` John Snow
2015-05-22 19:52 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2015-05-31 19:54 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2015-06-01 15:57 ` John Snow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5507D680.5030507@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).