qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@wiesinger.com>
To: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>,
	Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Fedora Virt preview and qemu 2.2.1 update
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:28:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5508723B.1040902@wiesinger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55083352.9000201@redhat.com>

On 17.03.2015 14:59, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 03/16/2015 06:20 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>> On 16.03.2015 19:49, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>> Since 2.3 rc0 should be out tomorrow, I'll just wait for that to be released
>>> and build it for rawhide/f22 and virt-preview
>>>
>> Shouldn't we have a 2.2.1 version, too?
>>
>> A reference point between 2.1 and the not yet released version 2.3 version
>> would be fine.
>>
> The repos don't really work like that. If I build 2.2.1, then soon after build
> 2.3-rc0, the 2.2.1 packages will disappear from the repos. In the case of
> rawhide you could still grab it from koji, but for virt-preview the 2.2.1
> package would be gone. So I don't see the usefulness in putting in effort to
> package 2.2.1 when it will only be available for a very brief window of time.
>

Yes, but shouldn't be there a difference between rawhide (e.g. 2.3-rc0) 
and fedora virt preview library (e.g. currently 2.2.1)?
Or is rawhide everything and fedora-virt-preview.repo only the virt part 
of rawhide?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Preview_Repository
http://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virt-preview/fedora-virt-preview.repo

Nevertheless I don't see any advantages releasing RC production quality 
to the rawhide repository as we expect the release soon.

As my question regarding "support" for virt preview was not answered 
when I had problems and tried it I think I'll switch back to Fedora 
supported repos.

Thank you anyway.

Ciao,
Gerhard

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-17 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-13 21:18 [Qemu-devel] Fedora Virt preview and qemu 2.2.1 update Gerhard Wiesinger
2015-03-14  0:07 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2015-03-16 18:49   ` Cole Robinson
2015-03-16 22:20     ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2015-03-17 13:59       ` Cole Robinson
2015-03-17 18:28         ` Gerhard Wiesinger [this message]
2015-03-17 18:43           ` Eric Blake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5508723B.1040902@wiesinger.com \
    --to=lists@wiesinger.com \
    --cc=crobinso@redhat.com \
    --cc=kchamart@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).