From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXwSS-0006j4-Fy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:43:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXwSO-0008NF-AH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:43:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXwSO-0008MK-2H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:43:12 -0400 Message-ID: <550875BC.7010601@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:43:08 -0600 From: Eric Blake MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5503542F.2080005@wiesinger.com> <20150314000749.GB28559@tesla.redhat.com> <550725C2.7020605@redhat.com> <5507571B.4020007@wiesinger.com> <55083352.9000201@redhat.com> <5508723B.1040902@wiesinger.com> In-Reply-To: <5508723B.1040902@wiesinger.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dPMnQj4sP5hgLE8jgmDA0m3bWN6llNJiu" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Fedora Virt preview and qemu 2.2.1 update List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerhard Wiesinger , Cole Robinson , Kashyap Chamarthy Cc: qemu-devel This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --dPMnQj4sP5hgLE8jgmDA0m3bWN6llNJiu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/17/2015 12:28 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: > Yes, but shouldn't be there a difference between rawhide (e.g. 2.3-rc0)= > and fedora virt preview library (e.g. currently 2.2.1)? > Or is rawhide everything and fedora-virt-preview.repo only the virt par= t > of rawhide? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Preview_Repository > http://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virt-preview/fedora-virt-preview.re= po fedora-virt-preview aims to ship in Fedora N what you would otherwise have to use Fedora N+1 for, limiting to just virtualization packages. So if rawhide (F23) is shipping qemu 2.2.1, then fedora-virt-preview for F22 will also ship qemu 2.2.1. >=20 > Nevertheless I don't see any advantages releasing RC production quality= > to the rawhide repository as we expect the release soon. I see tremendous benefit to putting the RC candidate in rawhide - that much extra testing to make sure the final release is not going to cause unexpected regressions. >=20 > As my question regarding "support" for virt preview was not answered > when I had problems and tried it I think I'll switch back to Fedora > supported repos. This list isn't the primary list for fedora-virt-preview questions; it's not that the product is unsupported, but that the support is better found on the correct list. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --dPMnQj4sP5hgLE8jgmDA0m3bWN6llNJiu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVCHW8AAoJEKeha0olJ0NqMb4IAK2VKSto6QQR118YIH0KHsZq GvpcVz1GWI6riXiG+8FnP7DXj39UsFEfAoZacLpr92f9J0ITQMUhGwW18tEWEwxQ wwm21R8BPoZ31jx5PgM2vQg2CfVk1qCtrOYiW4F8SDKuWwezTlhCqUrj09LkzX0X Zb0qiqQwTp/8K0GQruGJcCFHycIXVJ9/LmfrFHdYnmaln3G27bQdrjrEZ9rJ1ioc ci+2ZPiZymJYmAkCqMCvpM23FEAQxjdxGN+dERdoWtA9D++Mv1mR/+Ntm6fxQdP0 n508yeVoAEaM4Aywp87Dme/CGFDLYY5G+Ydo0/g3THeRkzK2Nq6tJ8PLm2vJAYg= =S/uG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dPMnQj4sP5hgLE8jgmDA0m3bWN6llNJiu--