From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYbgy-0007Yi-F8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:45:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYbgx-0004b8-Ih for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:45:00 -0400 Message-ID: <550AE0E2.6010802@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:44:50 -0400 From: Max Reitz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1426768413-31079-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <1426768413-31079-4-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <550AE0B7.80800@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <550AE0B7.80800@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] qemu-iotests: Some qemu-img convert tests List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: pl@kamp.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com On 2015-03-19 at 10:44, Max Reitz wrote: > On 2015-03-19 at 08:33, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> This adds a regression test for some problems that the qemu-img convert >> rewrite just fixed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf >> --- >> tests/qemu-iotests/122 | 223 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/qemu-iotests/122.out | 209 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 433 insertions(+) >> create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/122 >> create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/122.out > > [snip] > >> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/group b/tests/qemu-iotests/group >> index 6262127..7c20ace 100644 >> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/group >> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/group >> @@ -122,5 +122,6 @@ >> 115 rw auto >> 116 rw auto quick >> 121 rw auto >> +122 rw auto quick >> 123 rw auto quick >> 128 rw auto quick > > As I mistakenly replied to v2 just now, this test takes 17 s on my > HDD, and 7 s in tmpfs. So are you sure it should be added to the > "quick" group? *v1... I somehow don't seem too awake today. > The test itself looks good, though. > > Max