From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.3] numa: pc: fix default VCPU to node mapping
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:21:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <550AF793.8030106@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426696705-32472-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
Igor,
Some minor nits I overlooked:
Am 18.03.2015 um 17:38 schrieb Igor Mammedov:
> since commit
"Since" :)
> dd0247e0 pc: acpi: mark all possible CPUs as enabled in SRAT
> Linux kernel actually tries to use CPU to Node mapping from
> QEMU provided SRAT table instead of discarding it, and that
> in some cases breaks build_sched_domains() which expects
> sane mapping where cores/threads belonging to the same socket
> are on the same NUMA node.
>
> With current default round-robin mapping of VCPUs to nodes
> guest ends-up with cores/threads belonging to the same socket
> being on different NUMA nodes.
>
> For example with following CLI:
> qemu-kvm -m 4G -smp 5,sockets=2,cores=4,threads=1,maxcpus=8 \
> -numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1
There is no qemu-kvm upstream, use qemu-system-x86_64 instead?
Isn't the 5 wrong here? I would expect sockets, cores and threads
overriding that value to 8.
> 2.6.32 based kernels will hang on boot due to incorrectly build
"built"?
> sched_group-s list in update_sd_lb_stats()
> so comment in QEMU justifying dumb default mapping:
> "
> guest OSes must cope with this anyway, because there are BIOSes
> out there in real machines which also use this scheme.
> "
> isn't really valid.
>
> Replacing default mapping with a manual, where VCPUs belonging to
> the same socket are on the same NUMA node, fixes issue for
"fixes the issue"
> guests which can't handle nonsense topology i.e. changing CLI to:
> -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-3 -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-7
>
> So instead of simply scattering VCPUs around nodes, map
> the same socket VCPUs to the same NUMA node, which is what
> guest would expect from a sane hardware/BIOS.
"guests"?
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-19 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-18 16:38 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-2.3] numa: pc: fix default VCPU to node mapping Igor Mammedov
2015-03-19 16:05 ` Andreas Färber
2015-03-19 16:10 ` Igor Mammedov
2015-03-19 16:21 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2015-03-19 16:28 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=550AF793.8030106@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).