qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>, rjones@redhat.com
Cc: mst@redhat.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	agraf@suse.de
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] i6300esb: Fix signed integer overflow
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:13:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <550BE4B6.2040405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426821116-16617-3-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>



On 20/03/2015 04:11, David Gibson wrote:
> If the guest programs a sufficiently large timeout value an integer
> overflow can occur in i6300esb_restart_timer().  e.g. if the maximum
> possible timer preload value of 0xfffff is programmed then we end up with
> the calculation:
> 
> timeout = get_ticks_per_sec() * (0xfffff << 15) / 33000000;
> 
> get_ticks_per_sec() returns 1000000000 (10^9) giving:
> 
>      10^9 * (0xfffff * 2^15) == 0x1dcd632329b000000 (65 bits)
> 
> Obviously the division by 33MHz brings it back under 64-bits, but the
> overflow has already occurred.
> 
> Since signed integer overflow has undefined behaviour in C, in theory this
> could be arbitrarily bad.  In practice, the overflowed value wraps around
> to something negative, causing the watchdog to immediately expire, killing
> the guest, which is still fairly bad.
> 
> The bug can be triggered by running a Linux guest, loading the i6300esb
> driver with parameter "heartbeat=2046" and opening /dev/watchdog.  The
> watchdog will trigger as soon as the device is opened.
> 
> This patch corrects the problem by using an __int128_t temporary.  With
> suitable rearrangement of the calculations, I expect it would be possible
> to avoid the __int128_t.  But since we already use __int128_t extensively
> in the memory region code, and this is not a hot path, the super-wide
> integer seems like the simplest approach.

We don't use __int128_t, we use the Int128 struct---which however
doesn't have a multiplication function.  __int128_t is not available on
32-bit machines, and is only used under #ifdef CONFIG_INT128.

Instead, you can use muldiv64 which has exactly this purpose.

Paolo

> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
>  hw/watchdog/wdt_i6300esb.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/watchdog/wdt_i6300esb.c b/hw/watchdog/wdt_i6300esb.c
> index e694fa9..11728af 100644
> --- a/hw/watchdog/wdt_i6300esb.c
> +++ b/hw/watchdog/wdt_i6300esb.c
> @@ -125,8 +125,14 @@ static void i6300esb_restart_timer(I6300State *d, int stage)
>      else
>          timeout <<= 5;
>  
> -    /* Get the timeout in units of ticks_per_sec. */
> -    timeout = get_ticks_per_sec() * timeout / 33000000;
> +    /* Get the timeout in units of ticks_per_sec.
> +     *
> +     * ticks_per_sec is typically 10^9 == 0x3B9ACA00 (30 bits), with
> +     * 20 bits of user supplied preload, and 15 bits of scale, the
> +     * multiply here can exceed 64-bits, before we divide by 33MHz, so
> +     * we use a 128-bit temporary
> +     */
> +    timeout = (__int128_t)get_ticks_per_sec() * timeout / 33000000;
>  
>      i6300esb_debug("stage %d, timeout %" PRIi64 "\n", d->stage, timeout);
>  
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-20  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-20  3:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix bugs in i6300esb watchdog timer David Gibson
2015-03-20  3:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] i6300esb: Correct endiannness David Gibson
2015-03-20  8:54   ` Richard W.M. Jones
2015-03-20  3:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] i6300esb: Fix signed integer overflow David Gibson
2015-03-20  8:45   ` Richard W.M. Jones
2015-03-20  9:13   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-03-23  0:18     ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=550BE4B6.2040405@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rjones@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).