From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.3 v2] cpus: Don't kick un-realized cpus.
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:07:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5510020A.4030605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427107689-6946-1-git-send-email-peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
On 23/03/2015 11:48, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> following a464982499b2f637f6699e3d03e0a9d2e0b5288b, it's now possible for
> there to be attempts to take the BQL before CPUs have been realized in
> cases where a machine model inits peripherals before the first CPU.
>
> BQL lock aquisition kicks the first_cpu, leading to a segfault if this
> happens pre-realize. Guard the CPU kick routine to perform no action for
> a CPU that doesn't exist or doesn't have a thread yet.
>
> There was a fix to this with commit
> 6b49809c597331803ea941eadda813e5bb4e8fe2, but the check there misses
> the case where the CPU has been inited and not realized. Strengthen the
> check to make sure that the first_cpu has a thread (i.e. it is
> realized) before allowing the kick.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
> ---
> Fixed since V1:
> Change implementation to match 6b49809c597331803ea941eadda813e5bb4e8fe2
> ---
> cpus.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
> index 314df16..e6dcae3 100644
> --- a/cpus.c
> +++ b/cpus.c
> @@ -1119,7 +1119,7 @@ bool qemu_in_vcpu_thread(void)
> void qemu_mutex_lock_iothread(void)
> {
> atomic_inc(&iothread_requesting_mutex);
> - if (!tcg_enabled() || !first_cpu) {
> + if (!tcg_enabled() || !first_cpu || !first_cpu->thread) {
> qemu_mutex_lock(&qemu_global_mutex);
> atomic_dec(&iothread_requesting_mutex);
> } else {
>
Thanks, applied.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-23 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-23 10:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.3 v2] cpus: Don't kick un-realized cpus Peter Crosthwaite
2015-03-23 12:07 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-23 10:47 Peter Crosthwaite
2015-03-23 10:41 Peter Crosthwaite
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5510020A.4030605@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).