From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaQRr-0004tJ-8H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:09:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaQRm-0005qO-9G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:08:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaQRm-0005q5-1l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:08:50 -0400 Message-ID: <55117DF5.7000408@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:08:37 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5511787F.40301@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: memory API changes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Peter Crosthwaite , QEMU Developers , Greg Bellows , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , Richard Henderson On 24/03/2015 15:53, Peter Maydell wrote: >> > In any case, the removal or segregation of ld/st*_phys should be a >> > separate series for ease of review. > Who wants to remove ld/st*_phys? Not me... Well, you want to rename them _and_ add new arguments. Basically at the end they don't exist anymore as we know them now. :) Paolo