From: "François Revol" <revol@free.fr>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
Alexander von Gluck IV <kallisti5@unixzen.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Haiku: Platform build fixes
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:51:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5511F897.6000004@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5511F5E5.8000805@suse.de>
On 25/03/2015 00:40, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 25.03.2015 um 00:11 schrieb Max Filippov:
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:03 AM, François Revol <revol@free.fr> wrote:
>>> On 24/03/2015 23:56, Max Filippov wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>>>>> Am 24.03.2015 um 00:36 schrieb Alexander von Gluck IV:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why convert from array to switch statement? It looks like a very
>>>>> invasive change for no obvious reason.
>>>>
>>>> I'd be interested to know the reason too, but I'm OK with either way.
>>>
>>> Maybe because negative array indices are usually a bad idea in C?
>>
>> Sounds like a good reason (:
>
> True, but assumes that error codes are indeed negative.
>
> AFAIU linking with -lposix_error_helper or so (-> configure/Makefile*)
> may be an alternative, keeping errors POSIX-compliant in our code. I
> don't recall the implementation details though...
Indeed, although it doesn't solve everything (some things like nginx
want to use deprecated things like sys_errlist[] (although they dropped
this) or assume the codes are all < some very low positive value), and I
suspect it could have strange side effects on code used as a library by
other things.
As for myself, I consider POSIX to be boggus (they even changed their
mind in some places) and error prone on this (I've ported enough foreign
code to assert this) :p
François.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-24 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-23 23:36 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Haiku: Platform build fixes Alexander von Gluck IV
2015-03-24 22:26 ` Andreas Färber
2015-03-24 22:56 ` Max Filippov
2015-03-24 23:03 ` François Revol
2015-03-24 23:11 ` Max Filippov
2015-03-24 23:40 ` Andreas Färber
2015-03-24 23:51 ` François Revol [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5511F897.6000004@free.fr \
--to=revol@free.fr \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=kallisti5@unixzen.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).