Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] tests: Use qtest_add_data_func() consistently

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Am 25.03.2015 um 23:14 schrieb John Snow:
> On 03/25/2015 02:20 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Replace uses of g_test_add_data_func() for QTest test cases.
>>
>> It is still valid to use it for any non-QTest test cases,
>> which are not run for multiple target binaries.
>>
>> Suggested-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>> ---
>>   tests/ahci-test.c       |  9 ++-------
>>   tests/e1000-test.c      |  4 ++--
>>   tests/eepro100-test.c   |  5 ++---
>>   tests/endianness-test.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>>   tests/pc-cpu-test.c     | 13 ++++++-------
>>   tests/qom-test.c        |  4 ++--
>>   6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
[...]
> Seems fine to me. The time lost with the nested printfs during test
> initialization is likely not worth crying over in the glorious name of
> consistency.
> 
> ((Biased.))
> 
> Also, what happened to the subject of this mail? Are only patches 1-3
> for-2.3?

Yes, I tend to be conservative during the Hard Freeze and 4/4 is not
fixing a bug or improving test coverage. I don't think it would harm,
but I don't push for it. Opinions?

> All the same:
> 
> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)