From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45713) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YbXj5-0006Vy-HM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:07:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YbXj2-0004lk-8U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:07:19 -0400 Received: from mail.uni-paderborn.de ([131.234.142.9]:37085) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YbXj2-0004lg-1J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:07:16 -0400 Message-ID: <55158E41.90904@mail.uni-paderborn.de> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 18:07:13 +0100 From: Bastian Koppelmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] remaining patches for rc2? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers On 03/27/2015 05:42 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > This is the set of things I have on the list for "should ideally > get into rc2": > * AArch64 migration fixes > * VNC patches to fix CVEs > * recent exec.c changes broke ppc OSX/OpenBIOS boot > > Anything else? Hi Peter, I have one more TriCore fix (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/455433/), that could go into rc2. Is there a good point in time for you, when I should send a pull request? Cheers, Bastian