[Qemu-devel] remaining patches for rc2?

[Qemu-devel] remaining patches for rc2?

[Peter Maydell]

This is the set of things I have on the list for "should ideally
get into rc2":
 * AArch64 migration fixes
 * VNC patches to fix CVEs
 * recent exec.c changes broke ppc OSX/OpenBIOS boot

Anything else?

thanks
-- PMM

Re: [Qemu-devel] remaining patches for rc2?

[Bastian Koppelmann]

On 03/27/2015 05:42 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> This is the set of things I have on the list for "should ideally
> get into rc2":
>   * AArch64 migration fixes
>   * VNC patches to fix CVEs
>   * recent exec.c changes broke ppc OSX/OpenBIOS boot
>
> Anything else?
Hi Peter,

I have one more TriCore fix 
(https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/455433/), that could go into rc2. Is 
there a good point in time for you, when I should send a pull request?

Cheers,
Bastian

Re: [Qemu-devel] remaining patches for rc2?

[Peter Maydell]

On 27 March 2015 at 17:07, Bastian Koppelmann
<kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de> wrote:
> I have one more TriCore fix (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/455433/),
> that could go into rc2. Is there a good point in time for you, when I should
> send a pull request?

rc2 is scheduled to be done on Tuesday. "by end of the
previous day" is a good idea for pull requests that
should go into an rc.

thanks
-- PMM

Re: [Qemu-devel] remaining patches for rc2?

[Stefan Weil]

Am 27.03.2015 um 18:10 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 27 March 2015 at 17:07, Bastian Koppelmann
> <kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de> wrote:
>> I have one more TriCore fix (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/455433/),
>> that could go into rc2. Is there a good point in time for you, when I should
>> send a pull request?
> rc2 is scheduled to be done on Tuesday. "by end of the
> previous day" is a good idea for pull requests that
> should go into an rc.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM

Here are some open patches from my queue:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/450182/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/452748/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/452749/

All three are ARM related, so maybe you are interested to use them for rc2.
The first one is more important than the other two - those can wait for a
later release.

Stefan

Re: [Qemu-devel] remaining patches for rc2?

[Peter Maydell]

On 27 March 2015 at 21:07, Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de> wrote:
> Here are some open patches from my queue:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/450182/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/452748/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/452749/
>
> All three are ARM related, so maybe you are interested to use them for rc2.
> The first one is more important than the other two - those can wait for a
> later release.

These all look sensible and safe, so I'll put them into
a target-arm pullreq later today (together with the
migration fixes, hopefully).

-- PMM

Re: [Qemu-devel] remaining patches for rc2?

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 27/03/2015 17:42, Peter Maydell wrote:
> This is the set of things I have on the list for "should ideally
> get into rc2":
>  * AArch64 migration fixes
>  * VNC patches to fix CVEs
>  * recent exec.c changes broke ppc OSX/OpenBIOS boot
> 
> Anything else?

Nothing else from me (planning to look at the third item on Monday, at
worst revert).

Paolo

Re: [Qemu-devel] remaining patches for rc2?

[Cornelia Huck]

On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:42:18 +0000
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:

> This is the set of things I have on the list for "should ideally
> get into rc2":
>  * AArch64 migration fixes
>  * VNC patches to fix CVEs
>  * recent exec.c changes broke ppc OSX/OpenBIOS boot
> 
> Anything else?
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
> 

The s390x fixes I posted on Thursday, will send a pull request later
this morning.

Re: [Qemu-devel] remaining patches for rc2?

[Peter Maydell]

On 27 March 2015 at 16:42, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> This is the set of things I have on the list for "should ideally
> get into rc2":
>  * AArch64 migration fixes
>  * VNC patches to fix CVEs
>  * recent exec.c changes broke ppc OSX/OpenBIOS boot

We seem to be still a little way off on a couple of these
so I propose that we delay rc2 til Thursday, when I think
we should be able to have fixes in master.

-- PMM

Re: [Qemu-devel] remaining patches for rc2?

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 01/04/2015 12:08, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> This is the set of things I have on the list for "should ideally
>> get into rc2":
>>  * AArch64 migration fixes
>>  * VNC patches to fix CVEs
>>  * recent exec.c changes broke ppc OSX/OpenBIOS boot
> We seem to be still a little way off on a couple of these
> so I propose that we delay rc2 til Thursday, when I think
> we should be able to have fixes in master.

Sent pull request for the last item.

Andreas, Markus, what's the status of the device-add changes?  Are we
going to fix PReP or is that delayed to 2.4?

Paolo

Re: [Qemu-devel] remaining patches for rc2?

[Markus Armbruster]

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:

> On 01/04/2015 12:08, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> This is the set of things I have on the list for "should ideally
>>> get into rc2":
>>>  * AArch64 migration fixes
>>>  * VNC patches to fix CVEs
>>>  * recent exec.c changes broke ppc OSX/OpenBIOS boot
>> We seem to be still a little way off on a couple of these
>> so I propose that we delay rc2 til Thursday, when I think
>> we should be able to have fixes in master.
>
> Sent pull request for the last item.
>
> Andreas, Markus, what's the status of the device-add changes?  Are we
> going to fix PReP or is that delayed to 2.4?

I like Andreas's patches to fix PReP's pc87312 well enough, but I can't
justify taking them this close to the release.

We still need my "[PATCH v2 for-2.3 0/5] Contain drive, serial,
parallel, net misuse".  I can post a pull request if that's useful.

Re: [Qemu-devel] remaining patches for rc2?

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 01/04/2015 13:08, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Andreas, Markus, what's the status of the device-add changes?  Are we
> > going to fix PReP or is that delayed to 2.4?
> 
> I like Andreas's patches to fix PReP's pc87312 well enough, but I can't
> justify taking them this close to the release.

Same here, for what it's worth.

> We still need my "[PATCH v2 for-2.3 0/5] Contain drive, serial,
> parallel, net misuse".  I can post a pull request if that's useful.

I think so, thanks!

Paolo