From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, hangaohuai@huawei.com,
zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com, lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com,
mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dgilbert@redhat.com,
arei.gonglei@huawei.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
amit.shah@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com,
peter.huangpeng@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-blk: correctly dirty guest memory
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:21:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <551D5E61.7090305@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150402151650.GK15412@fam-t430.nay.redhat.com>
On 02/04/2015 17:16, Fam Zheng wrote:
>>>> > >> After qemu_iovec_destroy, the QEMUIOVector's size is zeroed and
>>>> > >> the zero size ultimately is used to compute virtqueue_push's len
>>>> > >> argument. Therefore, reads from virtio-blk devices did not
>>>> > >> migrate their results correctly. (Writes were okay).
>>> > >
>>> > > Can't we move qemu_iovec_destroy to virtio_blk_free_request?
>> >
>> > You would still have to add more code to differentiate reads and
>> > writes---I think.
> Yeah, but the extra field will not be needed.
Can you post an alternative patch? One small complication is that
is_write is in mrb but not in mrb->reqs[x]. virtio_blk_rw_complete is
already doing
int p = virtio_ldl_p(VIRTIO_DEVICE(req->dev), &req->out.type);
bool is_read = !(p & VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT);
but only in a slow path.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-02 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-02 13:37 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-blk: correctly dirty guest memory Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-02 14:39 ` Fam Zheng
2015-04-02 14:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-02 15:16 ` Fam Zheng
2015-04-02 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-04-02 16:26 ` Fam Zheng
2015-04-02 16:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-03 1:22 ` Wen Congyang
2015-04-03 2:47 ` Bin Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=551D5E61.7090305@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=hangaohuai@huawei.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.huangpeng@huawei.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).