From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33017)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1YfuRF-0001Lb-Ia
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:10:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1YfuRB-0003ga-Oa
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:10:57 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43022 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1YfuRB-0003gV-H4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:10:53 -0400
Message-ID: <55256F2B.8050502@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 20:10:51 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFEAcA__c2ey2AxgSm+zk+UEDAAuO_n-q=LnjUgCHRUuyFS7Tg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA__c2ey2AxgSm+zk+UEDAAuO_n-q=LnjUgCHRUuyFS7Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Last call for release-critical fixes for 2.3...
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Am 08.04.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> It looks like we have perhaps only a few more issues which need fixes
> to go into 2.3, so what I'd like to do is hold rc3 until we have them
> all fixed and then roll an rc3 which will with luck be our final
> release (bar the version number).
>=20
> Can people reply to this mail if they have things that need to go in?
> So far I know about:
>  * Stefan intends to submit a pullreq with a few patches tomorrow
>  * some patches from Dirk to use memory_region_allocate_system_memory
>    (though we've had several releases with this regression so it's
>    not a huge deal if these don't make it)
>=20
> Anything else?

I noticed (through a recent build-after-update failure) that the
Netduino2 machine is using a QOM type *_soc and wanted to fix that...
Don't find my patch right now, will post a new one then.

Regards,
Andreas

--=20
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG N=C3=BCrnberg)