qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Tao Xu <tao3.xu@intel.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] quorum: Implement bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes()
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 17:11:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <552f29f1-5b6a-82d3-a55f-100b460bcc6a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <w51a6vlfdf1.fsf@maestria.local.igalia.com>

On 13.11.20 17:07, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Fri 13 Nov 2020 12:49:04 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 11.11.20 17:53, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>>> This simply calls bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() in all children
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
>>> ---
>>>    block/quorum.c             | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>>>    tests/qemu-iotests/312     |  7 +++++++
>>>    tests/qemu-iotests/312.out |  4 ++++
>>>    3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Should we set supported_zero_flags to something?  I think we can at
>> least set BDRV_REQ_NO_FALLBACK.  We could also try BDRV_REQ_FUA.
> 
> We could set all supported_zero_flags as long as all children support
> them, right?

Sure, I was just thinking that we could set these regardless of whether 
the children support them, because (on zero-writes) the block layer will 
figure out for us whether the child nodes support them. O:)

>>> +    if (acb->flags & BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE) {
>>> +        sacb->ret = bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes(s->children[i], acb->offset,
>>> +                                          acb->bytes, acb->flags);
>>> +    } else {
>>> +        sacb->ret = bdrv_co_pwritev(s->children[i], acb->offset, acb->bytes,
>>> +                                    acb->qiov, acb->flags);
>>> +    }
>>
>> Seems unnecessary (bdrv_co_pwritev() can handle BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE),
>> but perhaps it’s good to be explicit.
> 
> pwrite_zeroes() does this additionaly:
> 
>      if (!(child->bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_UNMAP)) {
>          flags &= ~BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP;
>      }

Interesting.  Technically, Quorum doesn’t support that flag (in 
supported_zero_flags O:))), so it shouldn’t appear, but, er, well then.

Max



  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-13 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-11 16:53 [PATCH v3 0/2] quorum: Implement bdrv_co_block_status() Alberto Garcia
2020-11-11 16:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Alberto Garcia
2020-11-13 11:36   ` Max Reitz
2020-11-11 16:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] quorum: Implement bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() Alberto Garcia
2020-11-13 11:49   ` Max Reitz
2020-11-13 16:07     ` Alberto Garcia
2020-11-13 16:11       ` Max Reitz [this message]
2020-11-13 16:26         ` Alberto Garcia
2020-11-13 16:35           ` Max Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=552f29f1-5b6a-82d3-a55f-100b460bcc6a@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=berto@igalia.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=tao3.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).