From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9GO-0001T1-Il for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:37:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9GH-00049u-KP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:37:08 -0400 Message-ID: <553136AA.4070907@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:36:58 -0600 From: Eric Blake MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1428531604-9428-1-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com> <1428531604-9428-2-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com> <5531215E.7090900@redhat.com> <55312BDA.2090009@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <55312BDA.2090009@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lnQRC79CxpHVtSxsEi0pdMnq14lR4rjev" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 01/21] docs: incremental backup documentation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: John Snow , qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, vsementsov@parallels.com, stefanha@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --lnQRC79CxpHVtSxsEi0pdMnq14lR4rjev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/17/2015 09:50 AM, John Snow wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 04/17/2015 11:06 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 04/08/2015 04:19 PM, John Snow wrote: >>> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz >>> Signed-off-by: John Snow >>> --- >>> docs/bitmaps.md | 311 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 311 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 docs/bitmaps.md >>> >>> diff --git a/docs/bitmaps.md b/docs/bitmaps.md >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000..ad8c33b >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/docs/bitmaps.md >>> @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ >>> +# Dirty Bitmaps and Incremental Backup >>> + >> >> Still might be nice to list explicit copyright/license instead of >> relying on implicit top-level GPLv2+, but I won't insist. >> >=20 > I think I would rather not clutter up the document itself, if that > remains suitable. I don't mind those declarations in source code, but > for a document like this, it seems weird to have it in the preamble. >=20 > I can attach a license to the footer, if that's suitable? A footer is fine by me (I don't care where it lives in the document, only that it can be found). As this is a markup document, you should also consider whether a copyright should be passed on through to the rendered document, or whether it is fine for just the markup source as a comment that gets stripped during rendering (I would probably include it in the rendered document, but am not strongly opposed if you don't agree)= =2E --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --lnQRC79CxpHVtSxsEi0pdMnq14lR4rjev Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVMTaqAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqrI8H/Agl1Y27o6rPlkkNb/iZO8Mu Aphnu2bVZEHKClFDZEoHohPaChusZbys7GPSZrkX0tY40KpJRANuOpPcfxEcmwIb 3OPiSpRx7rsyZTnPRJ6tqCEqWnVpSgd9UC8B1bSDN5enU9xQmVhsGlNRv9zGmMS2 bzPS0OsaRWQZZcpnoCWm2U1fNlRGCrW/6hrnZqflXNmF2s39QXEWYA72s+zG4w8c /Z3WpYdGzpTH2J7X7jWlduf+N2+Mi/3DDxQhvpGL3EOjOVlOCBIekSna8u2L+2Pi VWfTRRrkA0cjOedaFtisml8t01vKj/Z27e3j5QpyGoTMw2jmuQaY/3MLhgGwaxw= =Dl5W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lnQRC79CxpHVtSxsEi0pdMnq14lR4rjev--