From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, vsementsov@parallels.com, famz@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/11] block: move transactions beneath qmp interfaces
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:43:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5531384F.3090100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55312E76.8040808@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2042 bytes --]
On 04/17/2015 10:01 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 27.03.2015 20:20, John Snow wrote:
>> In general, since transactions may reference QMP function helpers,
>> it would be nice for them to sit beneath them.
>>
>> This will avoid the need for forward declaring any QMP interfaces,
>> which would be aggravating to update in so many places.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> blockdev.c | 2581
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 1292 insertions(+), 1289 deletions(-)
>
> I'm not so sure about this patch. I mean... 2581 changes? :-/
>
> If you (or someone else) can convince me that forward declarations are
> really worse than this (is it more aggravating than having a patch with
> this diffcount?), well...
I like avoiding forward declarations of static functions, where it makes
sense, but I'm not going to insist on reordering code if it makes things
ugly.
>
> But even then, I'd strongly vote for removing dropping all functional
> changes beside the code movement from this patch. Because I'm seeing this:
>
> 2096c2096,2097
> < error_set(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE, "granularity",
> "power of 2");
> ---
>> error_set(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE,
>> "granularity", "power of 2");
Indeed - you WANT code motion patches to be as easy as possible to
review. From http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch
"Ideally, a code motion patch can be reviewed by doing git format-patch
--stdout -1 > patch; diff -u <(sed -n 's/^-//p' patch) <(sed -n
's/^\+//p' patch), to focus on the few changes that weren't wholesale
code motion."
> Probably sensible changes, but if you really, really, really want to go
> for this code movement, please apply them in an own patch before this
> one so that this one really is nothing but code movement.
>
> Max
>
>
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-17 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-27 19:19 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] block: incremental backup transactions John Snow
2015-03-27 19:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/11] qapi: Add transaction support to block-dirty-bitmap operations John Snow
2015-04-17 14:41 ` Max Reitz
2015-04-17 14:50 ` Eric Blake
2015-03-27 19:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/11] iotests: add transactional incremental backup test John Snow
2015-04-17 14:42 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-27 19:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 03/11] block: rename BlkTransactionState and BdrvActionOps John Snow
2015-04-17 14:51 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-27 19:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 04/11] block: re-add BlkTransactionState John Snow
2015-04-17 15:11 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-27 19:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/11] block: add transactional callbacks feature John Snow
2015-04-17 15:41 ` Max Reitz
2015-04-17 21:55 ` John Snow
2015-03-27 19:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 06/11] block: add refcount to Job object John Snow
2015-04-17 15:43 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-27 19:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 07/11] block: add delayed bitmap successor cleanup John Snow
2015-04-17 15:49 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-27 19:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/11] block: move transactions beneath qmp interfaces John Snow
2015-04-17 16:01 ` Max Reitz
2015-04-17 16:40 ` John Snow
2015-04-17 16:43 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2015-03-27 19:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/11] qmp: Add an implementation wrapper for qmp_drive_backup John Snow
2015-04-17 16:12 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-27 19:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/11] block: drive_backup transaction callback support John Snow
2015-04-17 16:55 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-27 19:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/11] iotests: 124 - transactional failure test John Snow
2015-04-17 17:04 ` Max Reitz
2015-04-18 1:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2.5 00/10] block: incremental backup transactions John Snow
2015-04-21 13:53 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2015-04-21 14:48 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2015-04-21 20:33 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5531384F.3090100@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).