From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49269) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9hD-00054S-83 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:04:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yj9h9-0004oG-77 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:04:51 -0400 Message-ID: <55313D29.5070603@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:04:41 +0200 From: Max Reitz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1427484005-31120-1-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com> <1427484005-31120-12-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1427484005-31120-12-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/11] iotests: 124 - transactional failure test List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: John Snow , qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, vsementsov@parallels.com, stefanha@redhat.com On 27.03.2015 20:20, John Snow wrote: > Use a transaction to request an incremental backup across two drives. > Coerce one of the jobs to fail, and then re-run the transaction. > > Verify that no bitmap data was lost due to the partial transaction > failure. > > Signed-off-by: John Snow > --- > tests/qemu-iotests/124 | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/qemu-iotests/124.out | 4 +- > 2 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Just as patch 2, this will need fixup for v5 of the transaction-less series. (the changes from v1 look good, though) Max