From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlCi9-000243-5C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 04:42:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlCi4-0007do-6M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 04:42:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlCi3-0007di-Uy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 04:42:12 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3N8gAFt007661 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 04:42:10 -0400 Message-ID: <5538B05E.9010602@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:42:06 +0200 From: Laszlo Ersek MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1429521560-2743-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1429521560-2743-5-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <55365C33.2090101@redhat.com> <1429628650.21164.24.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <55381571.4000201@redhat.com> <553817EC.3080608@redhat.com> <1429772550.26641.8.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <5538A22D.7020302@redhat.com> <1429778045.26641.20.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> In-Reply-To: <1429778045.26641.20.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] [wip] tseg, part1, not (yet) tested List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com On 04/23/15 10:34, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > >> I'll ask Jordan too about the dynamic feature detection, because there's >> another big hurdle with it (selecting a LockBox library instance at >> runtime, dependent on the presence of SMM). Deciding about SMM support >> at build time would make things hugely easier (because that's how >> firmware for physical platforms is built as well). > > piix/q35 falls into the same category I guess. We are just lucky that > (a) alot of the chipset-specific initialization is not needed on qemu > and (b) we can hide the remaining differences in ovmf-specific modules. That's precisely it. Thanks Laszlo