From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlYP8-0004ba-Kg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:52:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlYP5-0002Ty-An for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:52:06 -0400 Message-ID: <5539F702.7040708@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:55:46 +0800 From: Wen Congyang MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20150423101716.GF5289@noname.redhat.com> <5538CA77.4030708@redhat.com> <20150423104045.GG5289@noname.redhat.com> <5538CD0F.1060100@redhat.com> <20150423113631.GH5289@noname.redhat.com> <5538DD52.3020101@redhat.com> <20150423120533.GF2177@work-vm> <5538E174.9020201@redhat.com> <20150423121953.GG2177@work-vm> <5538E459.5030801@redhat.com> <20150424020149.GL2723@ad.nay.redhat.com> <5539A78D.1020206@cn.fujitsu.com> <5539F4F6.10507@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5539F4F6.10507@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH COLO v3 01/14] docs: block replication's description List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , Fam Zheng Cc: Kevin Wolf , Yang Hongyang , Lai Jiangshan , qemu block , armbru@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, Jiang Yunhong , Dong Eddie , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , qemu devel , Gonglei , Stefan Hajnoczi , Max Reitz , zhanghailiang On 04/24/2015 03:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 24/04/2015 04:16, Wen Congyang wrote: >>>>>> I think the primary shouldn't do any I/O after failover (and the >>>>>> secondary should close the NBD server) so it is probably okay to ignore >>>>>> the removal for now. Inserting the filter dynamically is probably >>>>>> needed though. >>>> >>>> Or maybe just enabling/disabling? >> Hmm, after failover, the secondary qemu should become primary qemu, but we don't >> know the nbd server's IP/port when we execute the secondary qemu. So we need >> to inserting nbd client dynamically after failover. > > True, but secondary->primary switch is already not supported in v3. Yes, we should consider it, and support it more easily later. If we can add a filter dynamically, we can add a filter that's file is nbd dynamically after secondary qemu's nbd server is ready. In this case, I think there is no need to touch nbd client. Thanks Wen Congyang > > Kevin/Stefan, is there a design document somewhere that covers at least > static filters? > > Paolo > . >