From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40332) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlZvZ-0002gc-M0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 05:29:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlZvW-0000Fs-EY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 05:29:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlZvW-0000Fg-6b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 05:29:38 -0400 Message-ID: <553A0CF5.9030304@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:29:25 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1429778977-1632-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <5538BBD3.9040404@redhat.com> <5538BE19.6030009@linaro.org> <5538C246.20304@redhat.com> <553A0657.6050100@linaro.org> <553A08D3.3020609@redhat.com> <553A0A4D.905@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <553A0A4D.905@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] irq: add get_gsi callback List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Auger , eric.auger@st.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, agraf@suse.de Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, patches@linaro.org On 24/04/2015 11:18, Eric Auger wrote: >>> >> I implemented this alternative but my concern is the check method is >>> >> called before the qemu_irq setting. So on this callback I cannot >>> >> retrieve the qemu_irq VFIOINTp struct container object needed to setup >>> >> irqfd hence does not work for me. >> > >> > Isn't the qemu_irq passed as the third argument to the callback? I >> > thought this solution was fine because you weren't passing the "int n" >> > from sysbus_connect_irq to your notifier. > Yes it is. But I need to access the EventNotifiers for trigger & > resample which were initialized before for eventfd trigger and stored in > the container object. Will study if I can restructure the code ... What did the notifier code look like with your patch? Paolo