From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54699) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlkZx-00087H-Ip for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:52:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlkZu-0004VM-64 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:52:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47222) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlkZt-0004Uf-Vx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:52:02 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3OKq0Ym005014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:52:00 -0400 Message-ID: <553AACEF.1050405@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:51:59 -0600 From: Eric Blake MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1429864368-15249-1-git-send-email-kchamart@redhat.com> <553A66A0.9020608@redhat.com> <20150424162039.GA25722@tesla.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150424162039.GA25722@tesla.redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kf6kfGp2sRo7988bfrgvr0Su6VrkvdqPf" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qmp-commands.hx: Update the supported 'transaction' operations List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kashyap Chamarthy , John Snow Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --kf6kfGp2sRo7988bfrgvr0Su6VrkvdqPf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/24/2015 10:20 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:52:00AM -0400, John Snow wrote: >> >> On 04/24/2015 04:32 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: >=20 > [. . .] >=20 >> These: >> >>> block-dirty-bitmap-add >>> block-dirty-bitmap-clear >>> >> >> Aren't merged yet, so it might be a little confusing. >=20 > Yeah, I expected someone to call that out, that's the reason I added th= e > NB at the end of the commit message which explicitly states that these > will be usable once your series (linked below) is merged, hoping that'd= > clarify. >=20 >> We could tack this on to the end of the transaction series if you'd >> like, and hopefully that all goes in at once before 2.4. >=20 > That works too.=20 >=20 > If it's preferable, I can respin this to remove the mention of above tw= o > commands and resubmit a v3.=20 I would have just added a note after the '---' line that the patch depends on the transaction series going in first. That is, basically appending this on to the end of the transaction series is the best approach for now, rather than trying to respin without the new commands. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --kf6kfGp2sRo7988bfrgvr0Su6VrkvdqPf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVOqzvAAoJEKeha0olJ0Nq6JYH/15LhNlvBjyGtpuWPq2ucW5H tonFRFCGPWMO2b4bUF+DMkouqIXHZ9HzyR7XGjtEIV4+h2P4uSuqYOo3ZhmlT1fH dx7xQfGXvAE0HEf6xGXEw7383jQCUDsh6URWo6QjApSyNnIKA/oiRgbLMM/1/YwI AtOuu5bJU3AJ41TeUuJx1murd7wKUFVeBS1Hjht2d3IHknBg1VTLO2Zb/Ft9Pzpn o9p9RC4mpb1Q2tKr8qwbNXQd/ENDJjqY/YrQvZwtlXYMGI7l3jsE4GOES+YtQ9rz JmUZ7wT0y/li3hAuJ6IJv3hu/RX3g50MBusXuW9cmpWAfhC5KXnKvUDy1XpTGYo= =wtuU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kf6kfGp2sRo7988bfrgvr0Su6VrkvdqPf--