From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35071) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ymlw5-0002uX-Uo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:31:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ymlw0-0003Q4-Ok for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:31:09 -0400 Message-ID: <553E6445.20309@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:31:01 -0400 From: John Snow MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1430122397-2807-1-git-send-email-mjt@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <553E4C5C.7010705@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <553E4C5C.7010705@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-options: trivial spelling fix (messsage) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake , Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org On 04/27/2015 10:49 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 04/27/2015 02:13 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev >> --- >> qemu-options.hx | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake > > But while at it... > >> >> diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx >> index 319d971..ec356f6 100644 >> --- a/qemu-options.hx >> +++ b/qemu-options.hx >> @@ -3106,7 +3106,7 @@ executed often has little or no correlation with actual performance. >> to synchronise the host clock and the virtual clock. The goal is to > > Is there any consensus on whether we should prefer US spelling > (synchronize) over UK spelling in our user-facing text? > I would just go with whatever the prevailing standard currently is. Can we run a spellchecker over our code in a UK mode and then again in a US mode, and we'll just go with whatever has the least errors currently? --js