From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ymo3M-0003vL-DI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:46:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ymo3J-0002kO-5B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:46:48 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46210 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ymo3I-0002kC-Qe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:46:45 -0400 Message-ID: <553E8412.2050600@suse.de> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:46:42 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 2.4 tree reopened; post-mortem of 2.3 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers Cc: Alexander Graf Am 27.04.2015 um 19:04 schrieb Peter Maydell: > (2) Late-breaking "this platform/compilation option combo is > completely broken" issues >=20 > Notably 32-bit PPC and ARM with latest libseccomp. Can we do > anything to try to surface this sort of thing earlier in the > release cycle, or is it just a fact of life that we have too many > combinations to be able to get to testing them all in time? All the features that I have enabled for 2.3 in our OBS now (including libseccomp via a revert) will also be build-tested once I check in the next -rc0 tarball. For now I don't package nightly Git versions though. Cheers, Andreas --=20 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG N=C3=BCrnberg)