From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ymquv-0004AG-1F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:50:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ymqhp-0004TU-2J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:36:48 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55023 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ymqho-0004TO-SB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:36:44 -0400 Message-ID: <553EABEA.4010802@suse.de> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:36:42 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1430164833-21006-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1430164833-21006-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] cpu_exec_init() cleanups List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Igor Mammedov , Paolo Bonzini Am 27.04.2015 um 22:00 schrieb Eduardo Habkost: > Those patches were submitted and reviewed back in March, and I believe = they can > go through the qom-cpu tree. >=20 > Patch 3/3 had to be redone because of new code. >=20 > Eduardo Habkost (3): > cpu: No need to zero-initialize numa_node > cpu: Initialize breakpoint/watchpoint lists on cpu_common_initfn() > cpu: Reorder cpu->as, cpu->thread_id, cpu->memory_dispatch init Thanks, applied all to qom-cpu: https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/qom-cpu Andreas > exec.c | 14 ++++++-------- > qom/cpu.c | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --=20 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend=F6rffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG N=FCrnberg)