From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ynpx9-0006Lu-Nz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:00:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ynpx4-0007JI-DP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:00:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ynpx4-0007GS-5S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:00:34 -0400 Message-ID: <5542438C.60002@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 17:00:28 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1430404944-7322-1-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> <1430404944-7322-5-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1430404944-7322-5-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/7] qom: add object_new_propv / object_new_proplist constructors List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: =?windows-1252?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= On 30/04/2015 16:42, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > + propname = va_arg(vargs, char *); > + while (propname != NULL) { > + const char *value = va_arg(vargs, char *); > + > + g_assert(value != NULL); > + object_property_parse(obj, value, propname, errp); > + if (*errp) { > + goto error; > + } > + propname = va_arg(vargs, char *); > + } > + > + object_property_add_child(container_get(object_get_root(), path), > + id, obj, errp); > + if (*errp) { > + goto error; > + } > + > + if (object_dynamic_cast(obj, TYPE_USER_CREATABLE)) { > + user_creatable_complete(obj, errp); > + if (*errp) { > + object_property_del(container_get(object_get_root(), path), > + id, &error_abort); Easier: object_unparent(obj); > + goto error; > + } > + } > + > + return obj; And another one: do we want to unref the object here, since we've added a stable reference via object_property_add_child? Do you prefer me too apply patches 1-2-3-5-6-7, minus the testcases, or do you simply want to resubmit? Paolo