From: Erik Rull <erik.rull@rdsoftware.de>
To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Comparison of virtual disks?
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 10:16:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5545D979.1090303@rdsoftware.de> (raw)
Hi all,
is there a comparison chart of the different disk formats supported by
QEMU? Especially throughput, latencies and robustness against unexpected
power loss on the host would be interesting.
Thanks a lot.
Best regards,
Erik
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-03 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-03 8:16 Erik Rull [this message]
2015-05-04 11:14 ` [Qemu-devel] Comparison of virtual disks? Max Reitz
2015-05-04 12:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5545D979.1090303@rdsoftware.de \
--to=erik.rull@rdsoftware.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).