From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50231)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <erik.rull@rdsoftware.de>) id 1Yop5E-0007gO-RT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2015 04:17:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <erik.rull@rdsoftware.de>) id 1Yop5B-0001cr-HY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2015 04:17:04 -0400
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:56945)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <erik.rull@rdsoftware.de>) id 1Yop5B-0001ck-9S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2015 04:17:01 -0400
Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([82.212.22.209]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de
	(mreue002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lj9fL-1ZPFtU1K19-00dTVe for
	<qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 03 May 2015 10:16:59 +0200
Message-ID: <5545D979.1090303@rdsoftware.de>
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 10:16:57 +0200
From: Erik Rull <erik.rull@rdsoftware.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Comparison of virtual disks?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Hi all,

is there a comparison chart of the different disk formats supported by 
QEMU? Especially throughput, latencies and robustness against unexpected 
power loss on the host would be interesting.

Thanks a lot.

Best regards,

Erik