From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqdoV-000444-ON for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 04:39:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqdoS-0005xX-FD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 04:39:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]:37727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqdoS-0005wD-8y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 04:39:16 -0400 Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so19332383wid.0 for ; Fri, 08 May 2015 01:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <554C7630.6020004@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 10:39:12 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <00d901d0880d$d795b750$86c125f0$@samsung.com> <012701d08827$4f771250$ee6536f0$@samsung.com> <00bc01d08890$3883bc10$a98b3430$@samsung.com> <554B7901.7070607@redhat.com> <00b501d0895e$abfe8660$03fb9320$@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <00b501d0895e$abfe8660$03fb9320$@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix default CPU model for ARM64 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Pavel Fedin , 'Cole Robinson' , 'Peter Maydell' Cc: 'QEMU Developers' On 08/05/2015 09:14, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > >> FWIW virt-manager 1.2.0 (just released) will do the following when creating a >> new VM: >> >> - aarch64 + kvm : -cpu host >> - aarch64 + tcg : -cpu cortex-a57 >> - arm32 + kvm : -cpu host >> - arm32 + tcg : defer to qemu >> >> Though if you explicitly request 'hypervisor default' then we won't specify >> any -cpu and defer to qemu, which will hit the cortex-a15 default for aarch64 > > virt-manager is not the only tool to create VMs... > But, okay. Seems you just don't want to change this. Well... I still don't agree and this > default looks strange for me, but it's just me. I'm out of further arguments. Actually I agree with your patch. It's the same that x86 does. Paolo