From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com,
mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, agraf@suse.de,
bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>,
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qmp: Add qom-path field to query-cpus command
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 16:46:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554CCC52.2000909@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150508143659.GI17796@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
Am 08.05.2015 um 16:36 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 08:51:45AM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 May 2015 16:09:58 -0300
>> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This will allow clients to query additional information directly using
>>> qom-get on the CPU objects.
>>
>> Eduardo, I'm not applying this patch this time because Eric's comments
>> have to be addressed.
>
> Yes, I will submit a new version later.
If you just add the "since 2.4",
Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
As to qom-path vs. qom_path, I think we're using qom-path elsewhere in
QMP or some of the scripts? I mainly care about the QOM properties being
consistent, so choose as you see fit here.
As for the reference to /machine/cpus/... I still think you're missing
the point I made on the call and in my RFC. You shouldn't expect all
CPUs to live in the same place like they do for PC or pSeries. Instead,
I think exposing the same search-by-type functionality we have in the
QOM C API in some QMP command (qom-search? qom-find? or qom-list?) will
be much better than trying to "equalize" the composition tree for the
benefit of libvirt accessing it by fixed paths. Therefore my abstract
socket type, and I would propose to do the same thing for the core.
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-08 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-04 19:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qmp: Add qom-path field to query-cpus command Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-04 19:17 ` Eric Blake
2015-05-05 7:51 ` David Gibson
2015-05-08 12:51 ` Luiz Capitulino
2015-05-08 14:36 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-08 14:46 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2015-05-08 16:25 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=554CCC52.2000909@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).