From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
phoeagon <phoeagon@gmail.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] block/vdi: Use bdrv_flush after metadata updates
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 18:02:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554F8117.1070800@weilnetz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <554F72E6.5060001@redhat.com>
Am 10.05.2015 um 17:01 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>
> On 09/05/2015 05:54, phoeagon wrote:
>> zheq-PC sdb # time ~/qemu-sync-test/bin/qemu-img convert -f raw -t writeback -O vdi /run/shm/rand 1.vdi
>>
>> real0m8.678s
>> user0m0.169s
>> sys0m0.500s
>>
>> zheq-PC sdb # time qemu-img convert -f raw -t writeback -O vdi /run/shm/rand 1.vdi
>> real0m4.320s
>> user0m0.148s
>> sys0m0.471s
> This means that 3.83 seconds are spent when bdrv_close() calls
> bdrv_flush(). That's the only difference between writeback
> and unsafe in qemu-img convert.
>
> The remaining part of the time (4.85 seconds instead of 0.49
> seconds) means that, at least on your hardware, sequential writes
> to unallocated space become 10 times slower with your patch.
>
> Since the default qemu-img convert case isn't slowed down, I
> would think that correctness trumps performance. Nevertheless,
> it's a huge difference.
>
> Paolo
I doubt that the convert case isn't slowed down.
Writing to a tmpfs as it was obviously done for the test is not a
typical use case.
With real hard disks I expect a significant slowdown.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-10 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 4:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] block/vdi: Use bdrv_flush after metadata updates Zhe Qiu
2015-05-07 10:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-05-07 15:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Eric Blake
2015-05-07 15:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] " Zhe Qiu
2015-05-08 13:14 ` Max Reitz
2015-05-08 13:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-05-08 14:43 ` phoeagon
2015-05-08 21:26 ` Stefan Weil
2015-05-09 3:54 ` phoeagon
2015-05-09 3:59 ` phoeagon
2015-05-09 6:39 ` Stefan Weil
2015-05-09 7:41 ` phoeagon
2015-05-10 15:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-10 16:02 ` Stefan Weil [this message]
2015-05-10 16:05 ` phoeagon
2015-05-10 16:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-10 16:26 ` Stefan Weil
2015-05-10 17:14 ` phoeagon
2015-05-08 10:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3] " Kevin Wolf
2015-05-08 11:50 ` phoeagon
2015-05-08 12:02 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-05-08 12:56 ` phoeagon
2015-05-08 13:10 ` [Qemu-devel] " Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=554F8117.1070800@weilnetz.de \
--to=sw@weilnetz.de \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=phoeagon@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).