From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrYRh-0002kW-3N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 17:07:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrYRd-0005De-Ph for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 17:07:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrYRd-0005DU-Ko for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 17:07:29 -0400 Message-ID: <554FC88E.70208@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 17:07:26 -0400 From: Cole Robinson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <00d901d0880d$d795b750$86c125f0$@samsung.com> <012701d08827$4f771250$ee6536f0$@samsung.com> <00bc01d08890$3883bc10$a98b3430$@samsung.com> <554B7901.7070607@redhat.com> <00b501d0895e$abfe8660$03fb9320$@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <00b501d0895e$abfe8660$03fb9320$@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix default CPU model for ARM64 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Pavel Fedin , 'Peter Maydell' Cc: 'QEMU Developers' On 05/08/2015 03:14 AM, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > >> FWIW virt-manager 1.2.0 (just released) will do the following when creating a >> new VM: >> >> - aarch64 + kvm : -cpu host >> - aarch64 + tcg : -cpu cortex-a57 >> - arm32 + kvm : -cpu host >> - arm32 + tcg : defer to qemu >> >> Though if you explicitly request 'hypervisor default' then we won't specify >> any -cpu and defer to qemu, which will hit the cortex-a15 default for aarch64 > > virt-manager is not the only tool to create VMs... > But, okay. Seems you just don't want to change this. Well... I still don't agree and this > default looks strange for me, but it's just me. I'm out of further arguments. > I wasn't implying any opinion about your proposed patch, just clarifying the details about how latest virt-manager performs since you mentioned it upthread. FWIW I agree with the idea of your patch - Cole