From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56715)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1YsdtL-0008Bo-H0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2015 17:08:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1YsdtI-00053i-AM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2015 17:08:35 -0400
Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]:36491)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1YsdtI-00053R-6B
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2015 17:08:32 -0400
Received: by qku63 with SMTP id 63so37412834qku.3
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 13 May 2015 14:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Richard Henderson <rth7680@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5553BD4C.3060305@twiddle.net>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 14:08:28 -0700
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1431544200-13371-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net>
	<1431544200-13371-4-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net>
	<CAFEAcA8f=xy3Tzxq1kWr4m0eWrAxQvEMYZGL=pJyyvoR5WdQRA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8f=xy3Tzxq1kWr4m0eWrAxQvEMYZGL=pJyyvoR5WdQRA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] tcg: Add MO_ALIGN, MO_UNALN
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Yongbok Kim <yongbok.kim@imgtec.com>, Leon Alrae <leon.alrae@imgtec.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

>     /* MO_UNALN accesses are never checked for alignment; MO_ALIGN
>      * accesses will result in a call to the CPU's do_unaligned_access
>      * hook if the guest address is not aligned. The default depends
>      * on whether the target CPU defines ALIGNED_ONLY.
>      */

Fair enough.

> Are unaligned accesses always slow-path, by the way?

Yes.


r~