From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YtFkN-0005K1-HZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2015 09:34:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YtFk6-0007qX-FC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2015 09:33:51 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]:34676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YtFk6-0007pp-BA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 May 2015 09:33:34 -0400 Received: by qkgx75 with SMTP id x75so70072350qkg.1 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 06:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <5555F5AA.2040701@twiddle.net> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 06:33:30 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] Unify and QOMify (target|monitor)_disas List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Crosthwaite , Peter Crosthwaite Cc: Peter Maydell , Edgar Iglesias , Claudio Fontana , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , "Edgar E. Iglesias" On 05/14/2015 09:52 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > Ping! > > Richard has RB'd the core stuff but do we need CPU arch maintainer > acks on the latter patches? Yes, I'd prefer especially the arm patches get another look. > What queue should this go via? TCG? QOM via Andreas would be my first preference. Otherwise, I'm happy with you sending the pull request yourself once you've got the acks. r~