From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
qemu-ppc <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] macio: Convert to realize()
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 14:42:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55573B3B.1030800@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pp629csz.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
On 15.05.15 15:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:
>
>> On 17.03.15 08:46, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 09.03.15 19:30, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>>> Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27.02.15 13:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>>>>> Convert device models "macio-oldworld" and "macio-newworld".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Depends on my "[PATCH 00/10] pci: Partial conversion to realize",
>>>>>>> which is in Michael's latest pull request.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you please poke me again when it landed?
>>>>>
>>>>> Applies cleanly to master now (commit 277263e).
>>>>
>>>> Hrm, does not seem to apply cleanly now. How about we postpone this to
>>>> 2.4? It's not really crucial for 2.3 and we're in hard freeze now.
>>>
>>> Sad (it's been on list for almost three weeks, most of the time waiting
>>> for the PCI pull), but it's clearly your choice to make.
>>
>> Yeah, but we're past hard freeze and I'd consider this not critical
>> enough to warrant potential breakage.
>>
>>> git-am doesn't dare to apply the patch on list, but git-cherry-pick
>>> applies the commit from which it was formatted without a peep. Result
>>> appended, just in case you'd like to consider it.
>>
>> Awesome, that was quick. Thanks, applied to ppc-next-2.4.
>
> Pull request ETA? I don't mean to be pushy, but I've been trying to get
> this in since February, and I got more work depending on it...
Some of the patches in David's latest spapr queue are regressing
compilation on older libfdt versions right now. If I don't see patches
to fix this, I'll just remove them from my queue again.
I could also use some help triaging the current autotest failures:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc-autotest/2015-05/msg00003.html
A good amount of those is probably upstream kernel breakage, but it'd be
good to know for sure.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-16 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-27 12:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] macio: Convert to realize() Markus Armbruster
2015-02-27 14:55 ` Alexander Graf
2015-02-27 15:26 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-03-09 18:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-03-17 7:26 ` Alexander Graf
2015-03-17 7:46 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-03-17 7:50 ` Alexander Graf
2015-05-15 13:43 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-05-16 12:42 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2015-05-18 7:11 ` Thomas Huth
2015-05-18 8:59 ` Peter Maydell
2015-05-18 9:28 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55573B3B.1030800@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).