From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Cc: nikunj.dadhania@gmail.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de,
mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm,loc-code
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:40:58 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555B052A.1030303@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h9r9f0hf.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com>
On 05/19/2015 06:14 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> writes:
>
>> On 05/19/2015 04:56 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 05/19/2015 02:51 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>>>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/07/2015 05:21 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>>>>>>> Each hardware instance has a platform unique location code. The OF
>>>>>>> device tree that describes a part of a hardware entity must include
>>>>>>> the “ibm,loc-code” property with a value that represents the location
>>>>>>> code for that hardware entity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Populate ibm,loc-code.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) PCI passthru devices need to identify with its own ibm,loc-code
>>>>>>> available on the host. In failure cases use:
>>>>>>> vfio_<name>:<phb-index>:<slot>.<fn>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2) Emulated devices encode as following:
>>>>>>> qemu_<name>:<phb-index>:<slot>.<fn>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>>>>>>> index 12f1b9c..d901007 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>>>>>>> @@ -769,6 +769,81 @@ static uint32_t spapr_phb_get_pci_drc_index(sPAPRPHBState *phb,
>>>>>>> return drck->get_index(drc);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +static bool spapr_phb_vfio_get_devspec_value(PCIDevice *pdev, char **value)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does it have to be a separate function?
>>>>>
>>>>> For better readability, i would prefer it this way.
>>>>
>>>> This is why I asked - I was having problems understanding the difference
>>>> between these two having 6 words names ;) Do not insist though.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is what I have now, simplified:
>>>
>>> +static char *spapr_phb_vfio_get_loc_code(sPAPRPHBState *sphb, PCIDevice *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + char *path = NULL, *buf = NULL;
>>> + char *host = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + /* Get the PCI VFIO host id */
>>> + host = object_property_get_str(OBJECT(pdev), "host", NULL);
>>> + if (!host) {
>>> + goto err_out;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Construct the path of the file that will give us the DT location */
>>> + path = g_strdup_printf("/sys/bus/pci/devices/%s/devspec", host);
>>> + g_free(host);
>>> + if (path && !g_file_get_contents(path, &buf, NULL, NULL)) {
>>> + goto err_out;
>>> + }
>>> + g_free(path);
>>> +
>>> + /* Construct and read from host device tree the loc-code */
>>> + path = g_strdup_printf("/proc/device-tree%s/ibm,loc-code", buf);
>>> + g_free(buf);
>>> + if (path && !g_file_get_contents(path, &buf, NULL, NULL)) {
>>> + goto err_out;
>>> + }
>>> + return buf;
>>> +
>>> +err_out:
>>> + g_free(path);
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static char *spapr_phb_get_loc_code(sPAPRPHBState *sphb, PCIDevice *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(pdev), "vfio-pci")) {
>>> + char *buf = spapr_phb_vfio_get_loc_code(sphb, pdev);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * In case of failures reading the loc-code, make it up
>>> + * indicating a vfio device
>>> + */
>>> + if (!buf) {
>>> + buf = g_strdup_printf("vfio_%s:%02d:%02d.%1d", pdev->name,
>>> + sphb->index, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn),
>>> + PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn));
>>> + }
>>> + return buf;
>>> + } else {
>>> + return g_strdup_printf("qemu_%s:%02d:%02d.%1d", pdev->name,
>>> + sphb->index, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn),
>>> + PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn));
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>
>>
>> I'd do this but I do not insist :)
>
> That is fine as well.
>
>>
>> static char *spapr_phb_get_loc_code(sPAPRPHBState *sphb, PCIDevice *pdev)
>> {
>> char *buf;
>> char *devtype = "qemu";
>>
>> if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(pdev), "vfio-pci")) {
>> buf = spapr_phb_vfio_get_loc_code(sphb, pdev);
>> if (buf) {
>> return buf;
>> }
>> devtype = "vfio";
>
> That has to be a snprintf.
No it does not. g_strdup_printf() below is enough
>
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> * In case of failures reading the loc-code, make it up
>> * indicating a vfio device
>> */
>> buf = g_strdup_printf("%s_%s:%02d:%02d.%1d",
>> devtype, pdev->name,
>> sphb->index, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn),
>> PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn));
>> return buf;
>> }
>
> Regards
> Nikunj
>
--
Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-19 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 7:21 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/4] spapr_pci: DT field fixes and PCI DT node creation in QEMU Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-05-07 7:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/4] spapr_pci: encode missing 64-bit memory address space Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-05-07 7:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/4] spapr_pci: encode class code including Prog IF register Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-05-07 7:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/4] spapr_pci: enumerate and add PCI device tree Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-05-07 7:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm,loc-code Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-05-08 7:42 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-05-19 4:51 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-05-19 5:04 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-05-19 5:14 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-05-19 6:56 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-05-19 7:41 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-05-19 8:14 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-05-19 9:40 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
2015-05-19 9:58 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-05-19 11:08 ` Alexander Graf
2015-05-20 3:13 ` Nikunj A Dadhania
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555B052A.1030303@ozlabs.ru \
--to=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=nikunj.dadhania@gmail.com \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).