From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37827) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yujmd-0007rW-No for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2015 11:50:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YujmZ-0000kQ-Q8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2015 11:50:19 -0400 Message-ID: <555B597B.9090307@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:40:43 -0400 From: John Snow MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1427651603-9210-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1427651603-9210-6-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <5519FA7A.6010002@redhat.com> <555B3457.4040803@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <555B3457.4040803@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC for-2.3? 5/8] fdb: Move FDCtrlISABus to header List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Kevin Wolf , Floppy , mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk, armbru@redhat.com, hpoussin@reactos.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org On 05/19/2015 09:02 AM, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > Am 31.03.2015 um 03:38 schrieb John Snow: >> You probably meant 'fdc' ! >> >> On 03/29/2015 01:53 PM, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >>> To be used for embedding the device. >>> >>> Add gtk-doc private/public markers for parent field. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas F=C3=A4rber >>> --- >>> hw/block/fdc.c | 87 >>> ------------------------------------------------- >>> include/hw/block/fdc.h | 88 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-) >=20 > John, I've rebased this onto the sun4m fdc change. Are you planning to > take this through your IDE tree or should this go through qom-next? >=20 > Regards, > Andreas >=20 I don't need to pick a single patch out of a series because you touch the FDC stuff, just keep it in-line with the rest of the patches. I haven't approved anything post-CVE-2015-3456 yet, so as long as you send the pullreq soon we won't hurt anything* *Except Kevin's series that he just posted this morning, but I'll deal with that. --js