From: "Michael R. Hines" <mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, arei.gonglei@huawei.com,
mrhines@us.ibm.com, quintela@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/10] Rework ram block hash
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 13:49:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555B85B4.6070903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429545445-28216-9-git-send-email-dgilbert@redhat.com>
On 04/20/2015 10:57 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
>
> RDMA uses a hash from block offset->RAM Block; this isn't needed
> on the destination, and now that the destination sorts the ramblock
> list, is harder to maintain.
Destination sorts the ramblock list? Is the patchset out-of-order?
I didn't see that yet..... Why is it sorted?
I would like to keep the ramblock list directly addressable by hash
on both sides, because, as I mentioned earlier, we want as much
flexibility in registering RAMBlock memory as possible by being
able to add or delete arbitrary blocks int the list at anytime during
a migration.
I will try to get the patchset that allows anyone to register memory
for transfer out as soon as I can.
>
> Split the hash so that it's only generated on the source.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> ---
> migration/rdma.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c
> index fe3b76e..185817e 100644
> --- a/migration/rdma.c
> +++ b/migration/rdma.c
> @@ -533,23 +533,22 @@ static int rdma_add_block(RDMAContext *rdma, const char *block_name,
> ram_addr_t block_offset, uint64_t length)
> {
> RDMALocalBlocks *local = &rdma->local_ram_blocks;
> - RDMALocalBlock *block = g_hash_table_lookup(rdma->blockmap,
> - (void *)(uintptr_t)block_offset);
> + RDMALocalBlock *block;
> RDMALocalBlock *old = local->block;
>
> - assert(block == NULL);
> -
> local->block = g_malloc0(sizeof(RDMALocalBlock) * (local->nb_blocks + 1));
>
> if (local->nb_blocks) {
> int x;
>
> - for (x = 0; x < local->nb_blocks; x++) {
> - g_hash_table_remove(rdma->blockmap,
> - (void *)(uintptr_t)old[x].offset);
> - g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap,
> - (void *)(uintptr_t)old[x].offset,
> - &local->block[x]);
> + if (rdma->blockmap) {
> + for (x = 0; x < local->nb_blocks; x++) {
> + g_hash_table_remove(rdma->blockmap,
> + (void *)(uintptr_t)old[x].offset);
> + g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap,
> + (void *)(uintptr_t)old[x].offset,
> + &local->block[x]);
> + }
> }
> memcpy(local->block, old, sizeof(RDMALocalBlock) * local->nb_blocks);
> g_free(old);
> @@ -571,7 +570,9 @@ static int rdma_add_block(RDMAContext *rdma, const char *block_name,
>
> block->is_ram_block = local->init ? false : true;
>
> - g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap, (void *) block_offset, block);
> + if (rdma->blockmap) {
> + g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap, (void *) block_offset, block);
> + }
>
> trace_rdma_add_block(block_name, local->nb_blocks,
> (uintptr_t) block->local_host_addr,
> @@ -607,7 +608,6 @@ static int qemu_rdma_init_ram_blocks(RDMAContext *rdma)
> RDMALocalBlocks *local = &rdma->local_ram_blocks;
>
> assert(rdma->blockmap == NULL);
> - rdma->blockmap = g_hash_table_new(g_direct_hash, g_direct_equal);
> memset(local, 0, sizeof *local);
> qemu_ram_foreach_block(qemu_rdma_init_one_block, rdma);
> trace_qemu_rdma_init_ram_blocks(local->nb_blocks);
> @@ -2248,6 +2248,14 @@ static int qemu_rdma_source_init(RDMAContext *rdma, Error **errp, bool pin_all)
> goto err_rdma_source_init;
> }
>
> + /* Build the hash that maps from offset to RAMBlock */
> + rdma->blockmap = g_hash_table_new(g_direct_hash, g_direct_equal);
> + for (idx = 0; idx < rdma->local_ram_blocks.nb_blocks; idx++) {
> + g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap,
> + (void *)(uintptr_t)rdma->local_ram_blocks.block[idx].offset,
> + &rdma->local_ram_blocks.block[idx]);
> + }
> +
> for (idx = 0; idx < RDMA_WRID_MAX; idx++) {
> ret = qemu_rdma_reg_control(rdma, idx);
> if (ret) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-19 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-20 15:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] Remove RDMA migration dependence on RAMBlock offset Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2015-04-20 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/10] Rename RDMA structures to make destination clear Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2015-05-19 17:52 ` Michael R. Hines
2015-04-20 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/10] qemu_ram_foreach_block: pass up error value, and down the ramblock name Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2015-05-19 17:56 ` Michael R. Hines
2015-04-20 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/10] Store block name in local blocks structure Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2015-05-19 18:00 ` Michael R. Hines
2015-05-19 18:46 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-04-20 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/10] Translate offsets to destination address space Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2015-05-19 18:28 ` Michael R. Hines
2015-05-19 18:44 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-05-19 18:57 ` Michael R. Hines
2015-05-19 19:02 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-04-20 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/10] Rework ram_control_load_hook to hook during block load Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2015-05-19 18:35 ` Michael R. Hines
2015-05-19 18:49 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-04-20 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/10] Remove unneeded memset Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2015-05-19 18:35 ` Michael R. Hines
2015-04-20 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/10] Simplify rdma_delete_block and remove it's dependence on the hash Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2015-05-19 18:44 ` Michael R. Hines
2015-04-20 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/10] Rework ram block hash Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2015-05-19 18:49 ` Michael R. Hines [this message]
2015-05-19 18:55 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-05-19 19:02 ` Michael R. Hines
2015-05-19 19:07 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-04-20 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/10] Sort destination RAMBlocks to be the same as the source Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2015-05-19 18:51 ` Michael R. Hines
2015-06-01 11:53 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-04-20 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/10] Sanity check RDMA remote data Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
2015-05-19 18:52 ` Michael R. Hines
2015-05-18 22:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] Remove RDMA migration dependence on RAMBlock offset Michael R. Hines
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555B85B4.6070903@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=mrhines@us.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).