From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/8] fdc: Fix MSR.RQM flag
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 17:27:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555E4DBB.9080802@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432214378-31891-8-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
On 05/21/2015 09:19 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> The RQM bit in MSR should be set whenever the guest is supposed to
> access the FIFO, and it should be cleared in all other cases. This is
> important so the guest can't continue writing/reading the FIFO beyond
> the length that it's suppossed to access (see CVE-2015-3456).
>
> Commit e9077462 fixed the CVE by adding code that avoids the buffer
> overflow; however it doesn't correct the wrong behaviour of the floppy
> controller which should already have cleared RQM.
>
> Currently, RQM stays set all the time and during all phases while a
> command is being processed. This is error-prone because the command has
> to explicitly clear the flag if it doesn't need data (and indeed, the
> two buggy commands that are the culprits for the CVE just forgot to do
> that).
>
> This patch clears RQM immediately as soon as all bytes that are expected
> have been received. If the the FIFO is used in the next phase, the flag
> has to be set explicitly there.
>
> It also clear RQM after receiving all bytes even if the phase transition
> immediately sets it again. While it's technically not necessary at the
> moment because the state between clearing and setting RQM is not
> observable by the guest, this is more explicit and matches how real
> hardware works. It will actually become necessary in qemu once
> asynchronous code paths are introduced.
>
> This alone should have been enough to fix the CVE, but now we have two
> lines of defense - even better.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/block/fdc.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-21 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-21 13:19 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/8] fdc: Clean up and fix command processing Kevin Wolf
2015-05-21 13:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/8] fdc: Rename fdctrl_reset_fifo() to fdctrl_to_command_phase() Kevin Wolf
2015-05-21 13:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/8] fdc: Rename fdctrl_set_fifo() to fdctrl_to_result_phase() Kevin Wolf
2015-05-21 13:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/8] fdc: Introduce fdctrl->phase Kevin Wolf
2015-05-21 21:55 ` John Snow
2015-05-28 17:29 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-05-29 7:50 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-05-29 8:33 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-05-29 9:11 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-05-29 9:38 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-05-29 10:27 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-05-29 10:34 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-05-29 10:55 ` Peter Maydell
2015-05-29 10:57 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-06-01 12:51 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-05-29 10:59 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-06-01 12:46 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-05-21 13:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/8] fdc: Use phase in fdctrl_write_data() Kevin Wolf
2015-05-21 13:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/8] fdc: Code cleanup " Kevin Wolf
2015-05-21 21:34 ` John Snow
2015-05-21 13:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/8] fdc: Disentangle phases in fdctrl_read_data() Kevin Wolf
2015-05-21 13:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/8] fdc: Fix MSR.RQM flag Kevin Wolf
2015-05-21 21:27 ` John Snow [this message]
2015-05-21 13:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/8] fdc-test: Test state for existing cases more thoroughly Kevin Wolf
2015-06-02 17:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/8] fdc: Clean up and fix command processing John Snow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555E4DBB.9080802@redhat.com \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).