qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: fix LOAD MULTIPLE instruction on page boundary
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 23:55:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55639A39.1040408@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150525210516.GB29207@aurel32.net>



On 25.05.15 23:05, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2015-05-23 12:33, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 05/23/2015 12:59 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> On 2015-05-21 14:42, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>>> Hmm.  Seems to be un/under-specified in the PoO.  That said,
>>>
>>> There is a small sentence in the PoO, in chapter "Program Execution",
>>> section "Sequence of Storage Reference":
>>>
>>>   It can normally be assumed that the execution of
>>>   each instruction occurs as an indivisible event.
>>
>> Ah, I didn't think to look in a different chapter.  ;-)
>>
>>>> It would be nice to know if there ought to be similar up-front access checking
>>>> for STM, to avoid errant partial stores.
>>>
>>> I have just checked, the same is also true for STM instructions, though
>>> it's probably more difficult to fix that in QEMU. Maybe we need a way to
>>> check if a load/store will succeed, preferably without using a helper.
>>
>> I did just suggest a new helper in the "unaligned stores for mips r6"
>> thread. Therein we provide a probe_write helper that does assert that the
>> given page is writable, or raise the usual exception.  It leaves the TLB
>> updated, so a subsequent write should take the fast path.
> 
> I guess it would work for softmmu, but not in linux-user mode, though
> that's even more a corner case.

For linux-user we could just implement probe as

  foo = load_x_bytes(addr)
  store_x_bytes(addr, foo)

or can we have write-only maps there?


Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-25 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-21 21:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: fix LOAD MULTIPLE instruction on page boundary Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-21 21:42 ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-23  7:59   ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-23 19:33     ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-25 20:47       ` Alexander Graf
2015-05-25 21:04         ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-25 21:05       ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-25 21:55         ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2015-05-26  7:09           ` Peter Maydell
2015-05-26 16:23           ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-21 22:00 ` Alexander Graf
2015-05-23  8:22   ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-05-23  9:26     ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55639A39.1040408@suse.de \
    --to=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).