From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yx1NJ-0002dK-Lp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 19:01:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yx1NI-00032T-Sx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 19:01:37 -0400 Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <5563A9C5.1000603@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 01:01:25 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1432498814-1469-1-git-send-email-crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com> <55638A0C.1000902@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <55638A0C.1000902@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] device-tree: Make a common-obj List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf , Peter Crosthwaite , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, afaerber@suse.de, Peter Crosthwaite On 25/05/2015 22:46, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 24.05.15 22:20, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: >> > There is no reason for device tree API to be built per-target. >> > common-obj it. There is an extraneous inclusion of config.h that >> > needs to be removed. >> > >> > Cc: Alexander Graf >> > Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber >> > Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite > Doesn't this mean that we're now linking against libfdt on > qemu-system-x86_64? We already are. Paolo