From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33293) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yx1T0-0003sE-8h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 19:07:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yx1Sx-0004jd-34 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 19:07:30 -0400 Message-ID: <5563AB2D.9050400@suse.de> Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 01:07:25 +0200 From: Alexander Graf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1432498814-1469-1-git-send-email-crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com> <55638A0C.1000902@suse.de> <5563A9C5.1000603@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5563A9C5.1000603@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] device-tree: Make a common-obj List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , Peter Crosthwaite , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, afaerber@suse.de, Peter Crosthwaite On 26.05.15 01:01, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 25/05/2015 22:46, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> On 24.05.15 22:20, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: >>>> There is no reason for device tree API to be built per-target. >>>> common-obj it. There is an extraneous inclusion of config.h that >>>> needs to be removed. >>>> >>>> Cc: Alexander Graf >>>> Reviewed-by: Andreas F=C3=A4rber >>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite >> Doesn't this mean that we're now linking against libfdt on >> qemu-system-x86_64? >=20 > We already are. Oh :( Alex