From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxFVZ-0004uj-Kl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 10:07:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxFVW-0001uA-F1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 10:07:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxFVW-0001tt-8T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 10:07:02 -0400 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4QE71jp012842 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 10:07:01 -0400 Message-ID: <55647E02.4000605@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 16:06:58 +0200 From: Max Reitz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1432135182-29676-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1432135182-29676-5-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <5560BC64.6060600@redhat.com> <1432622125.28482.2.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <1432645002.24602.9.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> In-Reply-To: <1432645002.24602.9.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] gtk: add opengl support, using egl List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 26.05.2015 14:56, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Di, 2015-05-26 at 08:35 +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> only). That, or pass -Wno-deprecated-declarations for compiling >>> ui/gtk.c, but that seems very ugly to me. >> We can also try some #pragma warn dance, to limit the >> -Wno-deprecated-declarations to a small code block. >> >> We have something simliar already for a bug in the gtk2 headers. > i.e. like this: I don't like it very much, but you're the maintainer, so if you deem it acceptable, I won't object. :-) Google says clang supports GCC pragmas, so it should be fine, because I don't think qemu is supposed to work with any other compiler anyway... Max